Bleh, what I said was taken out of context...I ment it as in that they would follow said laws and tolorate them to the best of their abilities, for their own safety and safety of others.
Upcoming Events
Collapse
There are no results that meet this criteria.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
More Fun Reminders!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Here's what the Book of Exalted Deeds says on lawful good:
Yashia is right in that they most certainly would not commit any evil deeds or something that would lead to such, no matter what laws they followed.In an evil culture or one that tolerates evil, lawful good characters are in a difficult situation. On the one hand, they abhor evil and cannot stand to see it institutionalized. On the other hand, they believe in leigitimate authority and will not overthrow a kingdom because of evil practices within it. Lawful good characters usually try to work to change flawed social structures from within, using whatever political power is available to them rather than toppling those structures by force.Talya Ilyenka - The Rashemi exile
Ameena Thender - The careworn Sunite priestess
Anorfiriel Foxfur - The gentle devotee of Angharradh
Comment
-
I've yet to see anyone log on a different character to carry on a IC/OOC fight, which to me, sounds like griefing. Not saying they don't do it, but damn, that just seems to be such an obvious no-no.
Which is good, because I don't think Hano would stand a very good chance trying to topple the Thayans by using force. lol.In an evil culture or one that tolerates evil, lawful good characters are in a difficult situation. On the one hand, they abhor evil and cannot stand to see it institutionalized. On the other hand, they believe in leigitimate authority and will not overthrow a kingdom because of evil practices within it. Lawful good characters usually try to work to change flawed social structures from within, using whatever political power is available to them rather than toppling those structures by force.
Reading this and playing a paladin for so long, I want to take up Saulus' comic idea. *shakes fist at the Arbiters*"Kaeldorn hates players." -Albert Einstein
Originally posted by DM CornutoLollercide coming back to the server, that dude's the Kobe Bryant of meta-gaming.
Comment
-
The whole notion of a Paladin being able to live under Bane's laws ends up being trivial anyway, as the only reason a Paladin would be in a place like Zhentarim Keep would be either a daring mission, or his/her own execution.Originally posted by Anks View PostIts common sense that they would, If they didnt they would be killed in a instant please, dont act over zealous.
The follow the current society's law to the best of their abilities, while upholding their own beliefs.
Otherwise they would... well like I said "killed in an instant."
Paladins do not have to be stupid. Lawful Good is misunderstood as much as Chaotic Evil is(and in some cases, all types of evil). Paladins don't follow every law the world offers.
Comment
-
They do if Machiavelli is watching! Trust me, I know!Originally posted by c2k View PostPaladins don't follow every law the world offers."Kaeldorn hates players." -Albert Einstein
Originally posted by DM CornutoLollercide coming back to the server, that dude's the Kobe Bryant of meta-gaming.
Comment
-
Lawful does not mean following the laws of society. It means following a code of laws. A paladin can oppose a society if its laws are directly in opposition to his own code of conduct.
A paladin could certainly be part of a rebellion, and even lead one, if the society he is rebelling against represents laws and morals that are strictly against what his own code of conduct dictates as 'right'. A law has to be 'right' for a Paladin to follow it. They don't follow laws just for the sake of following laws.-Arcanist Josirah Caranos, Red Wizard of Thay
Comment
-
-
True , True, but in most cases paladins will still tolerate the laws, they are not stupid people, come on really realisticly speaking a paladin will not start a rebelion in a Tyranical society, hes no stupid. sure he may "Follow" His own code. But that dosent mean he wont tolerate Evil to an extent for the greater good, IE his survival.Elric Modner. - "Yesterday I dared struggle against tyranny, Today I dare to fight once again."
Comment
-
I would think that in some (possibly many) cases Paladins will follow the laws of their chosen religion above all else. And if the laws of men go against said religion they would effectively say "Screw that" and do all in their power to change it, or possibly remove certain peoples from power... In other words I think it is acceptable for a Paladin, in some cases, to not follow the laws of men... Though traditionaly most laws are modeled after select beliefs common amongst many religions about murder and such. To sum that rambled crap up... Its all about CIRCUMSTANCES.
Of course that is only my opinion.. Which really doesnt mean much.
Comment
-
Originally posted by iowanscott View PostCIRCUMSTANCES.
Agreed... Now can we go back to the real issue at hand?
All fixed- Do not ignore NPCs-- If you do something evil around NPCs, think about how they would react. Don't stand around as though no one witnessed your actions. Get into a fight at Exigo? Run for the hills afterwards. Kill someone in Sundren City? Well, more than likely you'd be caught by a Legionairre, so just don't do it.
- Keep your emotes restricted to your own thoughts and actions-- I don't want to hear any more complaints about bad emotes, please. You cannot put words / thoughts onto other people. You are not superheroes, so don't do weird things you don't have the proper feats for doing, like having your eyes glow when you look someone over. And keep the emotes IN-CHARACTER: no more meshing of OOC frustrations into IC emotes.
- Learn to love evil-- You don't have to play evil to love it. We support it here. If you have different expectations on roleplay, then maybe Sundren isn't the right home for you.
- NEVER EVER switch characters to carry over IC or OOC conflict-- BIG TIME NO-NO. I thought this one was common sense. There is just way too much room for oversight and unfair reactions when you do this. If you get into a conflict with someone using PC A, PC B should not then come after the same person. THIS IS HARRASSMENT and will be dealt with harshly.
Elric Modner. - "Yesterday I dared struggle against tyranny, Today I dare to fight once again."
Comment
-
ENOUGH DERAILMENT. I don't care what you've heard from Joe and Sally about paladins, which has no place in this thread. Frankly, CLOSED."Microsoft has to move the Reply All button further away from the Reply button. It's the computer equivalent of putting the vagina so close to the sphincter."
-Bill Maher
Comment

Comment