I believe that "priest" is only a title. You call call yourself whatever you want, as long as you can convince everyone that you are, it doesnt matter what class you take. I used to tell people my paladin was an "adventurer". My fighter a "swordsman/mercenary". Though in your case, it would be hard to convince people that you're a "priest" when you can't perform miracles or blessings. It's like calling a person a "mage" when they can't shoot spells. People would expect them to do be able to do certain things. A bard may be able to pull this off if they read from "holy scriptures"(scroll) and casted a blessing on people. Then again, this is only my opinion.
Upcoming Events
Collapse
There are no results that meet this criteria.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Priests vs. Clerics vs. Faithful
Collapse
X
-
Going to more or less echo Jai here. You don't need to have levels in a divine class in order to be part of a clergy. Levels of these classes are often taken, but NOT a prereq in certain cases.
Those cases are usually quite easy to piece together too.
Mystra has wizards
Mask has rogues
Helm has fighters
Oghma has bards
etc etc etc
True, the lack of divine magic may be an issue, but would be no stranger than the cleric with 8 charisma and zero social skills. Sure he might be able to heal your wounds, but when trying to preach the good word of their god, they sound like a retard with stage fright. "Tyr is ..uh... holy and stuff."sigpic
Osclow Wiltenholm- "I have seen behind the mask and almost miss the bliss of ignorance."
Comment
-
The way I view this is that the priesthood is the entire religeous organized structure of a religeon in all its facets if a religeon has wizards or fighters in its religious structure and they take part in choosing which direction the church goes...the I would consider them part of the priesthood
Before the Paladin was introduced Cleric's fulfilled the role of the divine crusader...the militant arm of a church this isnt really inclusive of people who hold cerimonies for a bunch of commoners
But I would say anyone with official connections to the church...anyone whose word carries the weight of that church behind it etc... can be called a priest"Half the lies they tell about me aren't true."
Yogi Berra
Learn things:http://forgottenrealms.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
http://www.sundren.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
Comment
-
-
Second!
Okay third then...Lorlen Locke: "Amazing how the righteous commit acts of tyranny and terror almost as beautiful as our own under their banner of "good". We merely call a spade a spade."
"If you can't learn to do something well, learn to enjoy doing it poorly."
Comment
-
I agree with Kasso and GodBeastX. I believe that if you RP being pious and knowledgeable enough in your religion to become a priest, and become a priest, then I believe you should take a few cleric levels to represent this."Kaeldorn hates players." -Albert Einstein
Originally posted by DM CornutoLollercide coming back to the server, that dude's the Kobe Bryant of meta-gaming.
Comment
-
Agreeing with several of the others here.
I've actually played the equivalent of a High Priest in Sundren, and I even had a few faithful ask me the same question.
Whether or not I thought it was fair for them to be called members of the clergy as weapon masters and the like.
My view on it then was that there are plenty of ways to serve a church and gather renown for yourself, be a figurehead for said faith and spread interest in it without shouldering the title of priest.
The ability to cast divine spells is in Sundren not just a show of ultimatepowerz, but a connection with the deity you're representing. A priest is a much bigger deal than just a guy in a dress that says a few words on a podium.
Even the lesser members of a church are expected to be able to perform certain tasks as they rise in station.
I wouldn't go to a temple and expect the local priest to be completely incompetent at healing my pet gerbil.
Clerics may be bringing the thunder, but I wouldn't shaft the less powerful devout who've given up their lives to servitude.
Only way I could see a character with no divine levels earning their way into priesthood would be retirement.
Send them off to a temple to serve fulltime, as that's both how clerics learn to develop their abilities in faith, and it's what non-adventurous priests do."Sir, we're surrounded!" "Excellent! Now we can attack in any direction."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lothoir View PostRemove Favored Souls, make all other primary spellcasters application only.
but favored souls are cool, no matter what anyone says. i have never rolled one, but the RP behind them just screams I AM ONE BAD MOTHERFUCKER.
Make them RPotM winner only, like Warlock.Originally posted by ThePaganKingSo, the roguethree bootlickers strike again.
Comment
-
Perhaps what Sypthe is describing is the role of a Deacon or Deaconesses in some religions. Depending on the religion, a deacon/deaconesses are members of the laity. As laity, a deacon or deaconesses assist Priests in the administration of blessings, call people to prayer, etc. So they have role in the church without being a Priest.
And since a deacon or deaconesses are not a Priest, they are not permitted to perform any blessings or sacraments (or as Handsomeman put it "perform miracles or blessings") on their own.
If someone wanted to become a Deacon or Deaconesses in their church while continuing their full time profession as something else... they would have to be clearly devoted and have considerable religious knowledge. All religions have their own customs and rituals that require some degree of study or practice to master.
Cheers!Cheers!
Comment



Churches won't recognize a professed priest without divine ties. Although I'm more than happy to remove favored souls and clerics from the game <_< >_>


Comment