Jack's alignment

[Mighty_Draco]

Alignment is a source of never ending debate. This is probably caused by the fact that D&D has an objective system for such a subjective concept. So, to sedate my curiosity, I'd like to hear what others opinions are on the matter of Jack's alignment. Please note that alignment is subjective, meaning everyone's opinion's as meaningful as the next, whether it's that he's lawful good because he doesn't go on rampages causing the death and destruction of innocents, or he's chaotic evil for leaving the cap off the tooth paste.

[Machiavelli]

Is this thread my doing? Oh, I didn't vote btw!

[Mighty_Draco]

Partly, I don't much mind how you classify him, I just enjoy roleplaying him and let the DMs decide on such subjectivities, but I'm curious to see what others think now.

[Machiavelli]

I just tweak based on what I actually see!

[Mighty_Draco]

Sure, sure, fair enough

[sharringtonm]

I don't see the alignment criminally insane. How am I supposed to vote if not all the options are there?

[Machiavelli]

Partly, I don't much mind how you classify him, I just enjoy roleplaying him

That's the way!

Er... and could you code in a 'Criminally Insane' alignment category Sharington. That'd be useful!

[Mighty_Draco]

I suppose criminally insane would be considered under "other"

[Peridan]

Lol, who put "Lawful Good?"

[Chiangtao]

Yeah, where's Chaotic Stupid?

[rustediron]

I thought it was Stupid Evil?

[Mighty_Draco]

Yeah, where's Chaotic Stupid?

That'd be chaotic neutral

[Gairun]

Chaotic Stupid! Wootz!

[Kaeldorn]

Insane and totally chaotic, but he generally just doesn't care about anything. That means he also can't have evil intentions or goals (though his ways might seem that way), so that makes him chaotic neutral.

[undeadsteak]

Chaotic Neutral is not Chaotic Stupid! I'm going to killz u for saying that. >:O